Why racists love the minimum wage laws

A survey of Amer♛ican economists found that 90 percent of them regarded minimum-wage laws as increasing the rate 🍸of unemployment among low-skilled workers.

Inexperience is often the problem: Only abou💧t 2 percent of Amer🧔icans over the age of 24 earned the minimum wage.

Advocates of minimum-wage laws usually base their support of such laws on their estimate of how much a worker “needs” in order to have “a living wage” — or on some other criterion that pays littlꦰe or no attention to the worker’s skill level, experience or general productivity. So it’s hardly surprising t💮hat minimum-wage laws set wages that price many a young worker out of a job.

What is surprising is that, despite 𝓰an accumulation of evidence over the years of the devastating effects of minimum-wage laws on black teenage unemployment rates, members of the Congressional Black Caucus continue to vote for suc꧂h laws.

Once, years ago, during a confidential discussion with a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, I asked how they could possibly vote f𝔉or minimu𒆙m-wage laws.

The answer I got was that members of the Black Caucus were part of a political coalition and, as such, they were expected to vote for things that ꦐother members of tha👍t coalition wanted, such as minimum-wage laws, in order that other members of the coalition would vote for things that the Black Caucus wanted.

When I asked what could the black members of Congress possibly get in return for supporting minimum-wage laws that would be worth sacrificing whole generations of young blacks to huge rates of unemploy𝓀ment, the dis🍷cussion quickly ended. I may have been vehement when I asked that question.

The same question could be asked of black public officials in general, including Presiden⭕t Obama, who have taken the side of the teachers’ unions, who oppose vouchers or charter schoo𒉰ls that allow black parents (among others) to take their children out of failing public schools.

Minimum-wage laws c🍰an even affect the level of racial discrimination. In an earlier era, when racial discrimination was both legally and socially accepted, minimum-wage laws were often used openly to price minorities out of the job market.

In 1925, a minimum-wage law was passed in 🅷the Canadian province of British Columbia, with the intent and effect of pricing Jaℱpanese immigrants out of jobs in the lumbering industry.

A Harvard professor of that era referred approvingly to Australia’s minimum wage law as a means to “protect the white Australian’s standard of living from the invidious competition of the colored races, particularly of the Chinese” who were willing to work for lessꦑ.

In South Africa during the era of apartheid, white labor unions urged that a minimum-wage law be applied to all races, to keep black workers from ta🔯king jobs away from white unionized workers by working for less than the union pay scale.

Some supporters of the first federal minimum-wage law in the United States — the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 — used exactly t⛄he same rationale, citing the fact that Southern construction companies, using non-union black workers, were able to come north and underbid construction companies using unionized white labor.

These supporters of minimum-wage laws understood long ago something that today’s supporters of suꦛch laws seem not to have bothered to think through. People whose wages are raised by law do not necessarily benefit, because they are often less likely to bꩲe hired at the imposed minimum-wage rate.

Labor unions have been supporters of minimum-wage laws in co♔untries around the world, since🍰 these laws price nonunion workers out of jobs, leaving more jobs for union members.

People who are content to advocate policies that sound good, whether for political reasons or just to feel good about themselves, often do not bother to think through the consequences bef🅷orehand or to check the results afterwards.

If they thought things through, how could they have imagined that having large numbers of idle teen boys hanging out on the streets together would be good for any community — especially in places whꦜere most of these youngsters were raised by single mothers, another unintended consequence, in this case, of well-meaning welfare policies?