Business

Lawsuit claims Falcone swept in to steal steel deal

Phil Falconeā€™s controversial move to take a steel-fabrication firm private has landed him in court.

A shareholder suit that seeąµ²ks class-action status charges that the board of Schuff International ā€” whose projects inšŸŒ±clude the new Apple headquarters ā€” allowed Falconeā€™s firm HC2 to buy the company on the cheap.

The suit, filed Nov. 6 in Delaware Chancery Court, alleges that a specź¦‰ial committee designated by Schuffā€™s board to examine HC2ā€™s takeover offer was a sham.

“The special committee did nothing,ā€ the suit alleged. ā€œThe special committee did not conduct a process. The special committee did not attempt to negotiate a higher price. The special committee did not consider alternatives.ā€

Falcone ā€” who ź¦¦in an unusual arrangement had become chairman of Schuff after amassing a 70 percent stake, even as the firmā€™s board weighed a takeover bid by his firm HC2 ā€” declined to comment Monday.

HC2ā€™s tender for Schuffā€™s remaining shares at $31.50 a share was ā€œwell below the companyā€™s intrinsic value,ā€ ašŸ’œccording to the suit. Noting that Schuff recently landed a big construction project, the suit cited analyst reports valuing Schuff shares conservatively at $39.

Furthermore, according to the suit, HC2 on Oct. 29 bought a 65,000-share slug of Schuff on the open market at $34 ā€” a hšŸ’ealthy premium to its tender offer ā€” in order to surpass a 90 percent ownership stake, which under Delaware law gives it the right to buy the companyā€™s remaining shares.

ā€œPlaintiffļ·ŗ observed this volume and pricing information,ā€ but it was subsequently scrubbed from services including Nasdaq, Yahoo and OTC Markets, according to the suit.

The sušŸ’Æit even took a direct swipe at Falcone, charging he has ā€œa well-documented history with the SECā€™s enforcement division.ā€

It cited a 2013 settlement in which Falcone ā€œadmitted to using investor money to pay his own taxes, secretly favoring some customers over ź¦”others, and engaging in an illegal market manipulation.ā€