The Issue: Suppression of The Post’s story on evidence of corrupt deals on Hunter Biden’s laptop.
The true collusion that exists in our country is comprised of Democratic left-wingers, Big Tech, mainstream media, social media and well-to-do Hollywood and academic snobs, coupled with spineless politicians who remain silent for fear of cancellation (“They got away with it,” Oct. 13).
The Biden machine and all associated with it will a🗹lways 🀅“get away with it.”
It’s pathetically shameful that the so-called leader of the free world continues to insult the integrity of the American citizenry — ꦯand always with an arrogant smile on his face.
Jerry Chiappetta
Monticello
And so the double standard continues.
The mainstream and social media are all complicit in the Biden scandals. Unfortunately they’re still ꦓat it.
That said, I hope they’re all h🎃appy now with where our country iꦡs because of it. I, for one, certainly am not.
One year after The Post exposed💛 Hunter’s laptop, they still refuse to call it corruption.
B. Tonuzi
Wanaque, NJ
The Post’s front page reminds🌸 us that the Democrats who currently run this ��country also control the media and Big Tech.
Objective news reportin🐟g went out with Walter Cronkite. New York Times edᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚ𒀱ᩚᩚᩚitorials could well be written by Rep. Nancy Pelosi.
No, the Bidens will never be held accountable, just as Hillary Clinton shall never have to answer for Benghazi or the Russian collusion story, and former FBI Dꦓirector James Comey will prosper as a talk-show guest and author.
The p𒆙rivileged few that are in charge of our government are not accountable to the people so long as the media covers for them.
Robert Mangi
Westbury
I thinkꦆ we can stop pretending the excuse t🌳hat the laptop wasn’t verified is the reason The Post’s story was censored.
Believing and advanci🌞ng tꦇhat excuse is us playing the game they created. We can’t win at their game.
We need to stick with facts. They’re only pushing a certain narrative. We cannot call them out on hypocrisy and expect things to change. Theꦑy will not suddenly play fair because we point out what they are doing༒.
Steve Preziosa
Deptford Township, NJ
The Issue: Katie Couric’s decision to suppress Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s criticism of national-anthem protests.
Katie Couric was about 60 years old when she interviewed Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2016 (“Couric buried ‘truth’ on Ruth,” Oct. 14).
Couric withheld Justi♎ce Ginsburg’s responsꦚe because she felt “that Ginsburg, who was 83 at the time, may not have gotten what Couric was asking.”
No doubt Ginsburg understood the question. Couric didn’t like the answer. I guess it didn’t
go with the lefty philosophy.
Justice Ginsburg had a brilliant legal mind. It is an insult on Couric’s part to assume the justice didn’t u🐼nderstand her because she was 83.
Barbara Brussell
Oceanside
Katie Couric’s selective e♒diting of her interview with RBG is old news.
This sleazy “Today Show” presenter famously went out of her way to make conservatives like Sarah Palin and Ann Coulter look bad in her🤡 interviews with them.
While she “helped” RBG, she hurt Palin politically by trying to make this brilliant po𒉰litician look stupid with “gotcha” questions and biased editing.
“Americaꦉ’s Sweetheart” is just that: not a journalist but a Hollywood personality selling her supposed good looks and fake persona.
Andrew Delaney
Jamaica Estates
Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@btc365-futebol.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy and style.