Opinion

NJ’s absurd suit against Big Oil only benefits posturing politicians

Not to be left out of the left’s war on energy, New Jersey has become the latest g🔯overnment to sue big oil companies, claiming they hid inf🌳o showing that oil usage leads to climate-driven natural disasters, resulting in billions in damages.

The suit targets ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips and, for good measure, the American Petroleum Institute, claiming they breached the state’s Consumer Fraud Act via disinformation campaigns. It’s almost certain to fail — much as did multiple similar suits alleging the same deceptions (including one by Mayor Bill de Blasio) — but still harm efforts to boost US oil investmen🐼t and 💜production.

The plaintiffs’ argument is beyond a stretch: They claim oil companies knew burning oil would accelerate cli🐬mate change but hid the fact. That meant more cli🦩mate disasters, costing communities billions in damage.

Hello? The entire world has been burning oil and other fossil fuels for centuries. Why are these oil companies to blame? Noꦬr is thereꦉ any agreement on the extent of damage caused by climate change, let alone what share these companies have “caused.”

More important, the world needs their products and continues to use them willingly, especially since it lacks a sufficient suppꦺlies of any rꦐeliable, economically viable alternative. (New Jersey itself has plenty of state vehicles that still run on gasoline.) Be glad they’ve been meeting public demand.

Plus, as the Manufacturers’ Accountab☂ility Project’s Phil Goldberg argues, courts are “not the appropriate places to decide climate policy.” They can’t “take into account important aspects of America’s energy policy, including affordability for families and businesses, and energy security𒈔.”

Even President Joe Biden, who vowed to “end” fossil fuels, has threatened consequences for companies that don’t pump more oil. The companies are da🌄mned if they do, damned if they don’t.

For posturing pols, though, the suits are a win-win, even though courts keep tossing them. They shore up their anti-fossil-fuel cred to climate warriors. And outside groups — likꦉe the shadowy Collective Action Fund,ꦏ bankrolled by deep-pocketed left-wing organizations — .

And if the courts ever rule for the pols,🍃 plaintiffs like New Jersey coಌuld win billions. (The lawyers representing them, often from a law firm called Sher Edling, would take a huge chunk.)

Yet customers ultimately pay: “Expensive” judgments against the companies can jack up the cost of gas by as much as 31 cents a gallon, . And,💮 again, these cases do nothing to encourage investment in oil production to boost supply and keep prices down; just the opposite.

So if Garden Staters like paying $5 a gallon for gas, they sh﷽ould applaud Gov. Phil Murphy and his Attorney General Matthew Platkin for thಞeir legal theatrics. If not, they should remember when next they vote.