10 myths told by COVID experts — and now debunked
In the past few weeks, a series of analyses published by highly respected researchers have ex🐈posed a truth about public health officials during COVI🐭D:
Much of the time, they were wrong.
To be clear, public health officials weꦑre not wrong for making recommendations based on what🍎 was known at the time.
That’s 𒈔understandable. You go with the data you haveಞ.
No, they were wrong💦 because they refused to change their directives in the face of new evidence.
When a study did not support their policies, they dismissed it and censored opposing opinionꦅs.
At the same time, the Centers for Disease Contꦓrol and Prevention weaponized research itself by putting out its own flawed studies in its own non-peer-reviewed medical journal, MMWR.
In the final analysis, public he🐓alth officials actively propagated misinformation th💜at ruined lives and forever damaged public trust in the medical profession.
Here are 10 ways they misled Americans:
Misinformation #1: Natural immunity offers little protection compared to vaccinated immunity
A Lancet study looked at 65 major studies in 19 countries on natural immunity. The researchers concluded that natural immunity was at least as effective as the primary COVID vaccine series.
In fact, the scientific data was there all along — from 160 studies,🐼 despite the findings of these studies violating Facebook’s “misinformation” policy.
Since the Athenian plague of 430 BC, it has been observed that those who recovered after infection were protected against severe disease if reinfected.
That was also the observation of nearly every🐭 practicing physician during the first 18 months of the COVID pandemic.
Most Americans who were fired for not having the COVID vaccine🐟 already had antibodies that effectively neutralized the virus, but they were antibodies that the government did not recognize.
Misinformation #2: Masks prevent COVID transmission
Cochran Reviews are considere💮d the most authoritative and independent assessment of the evidence in medicine.
And one published last month by a highly respected Oxford research team found that masks had no significant impact on COVID transmission.
When asked about this definitive review, CDC Director Dr.𝐆 Rochelle Walensky downplayed it, arguing that it was flawed because it focused on randomized controlled s🍎tudies.
But that wasꩲ the greatest strength of the review! Randomized studies are considered the gold standard of medical evidence.
If all the energy used by public health officials to mask toddlers could have been channele♒d to reduce child obesity by 🗹encouraging outdoor activities, we would be better off.
Misinformation #3: School closures reduce COVID transmission
The CDC ignored the European experience of keeping schools open, most without mask🐻 mandates.
Transmission rates were no different,ไ evidenced by studies conducted in Spain and Sweden.
Misinformation #4: Myocarditis from the vaccine is less common than from the infection
Public health officials downplayed concerns abo🌱𒀰ut vaccine-induced myocarditis — or inflammation of the heart muscle.
They cited poorly designed studies that under-captured complication 🔯rates.
A flurry of well-designed⭕ studies said the opposite.
We now know that myocarditis is ♌six to 28 times more common after the COVID vaccine than after the infection among 16- to 24-year-old males.
Tens of thousands of children likely got myocarditis, mostly subclinical, from a COVID vaccine they did not need because they were entirely healthy or because they ꧂alre💦ady had COVID.
Misinformation #5: Young people benefit from a vaccine booster
Boosters reduced ho🤡spita🌺lizations in older, high-risk Americans.
But the evidence was never there that they lower COVID mortality in young, healthy people.
That’s probably why the CDC chose not to publish its data on hospitalization rates among boosted♛ Americans𒆙 under 50, when it published the same rates for those over 50.
Ultimately, White House pressure to recommend boosters⭕ fo🥂r all was so intense that the FDA’s two top vaccine experts left the agency in protest, writing scathing articles on how the data did not s🌞upport boosters for young people.
Misinformation #6: Vaccine mandates increased vaccination rates
President Biden and other offi🌺cials demanded that unvaccinated workers, regardless of their risk or natural immunity, be ﷺfired.
They demanded that soldiers be dishonorably disﷺcharged and nurses be laid off in the middle of a sta🧔ffing crisis.
The mandate was based on the theory that vaccination reduced transmission 💙rates — a notion later proven to be false.
But after the broad recognition that vaccination does not reduce transmission, the mandates 🉐persisted, and💖 still do to this day.
A recent study from George Mason University details how vaccine mandates in nine major US cities had no impa🤪ct on vaccination rates.
They also had no impac𒉰t on COVID transmissi♍on rates.
Misinformation #7: COVID originating from the Wuhan lab is a conspiracy theory
Google admitted to suppressing searches of “lab leak” during the pandemic.
Dr. Francis Col🍷lins, head of the National Institutes of Health, claimed (and still does) he didn’t believe the virus came fro🎃m a lab.
Ultimately, overwhelming circumstantial evidence points to a lab lꩲeak origin — the same origin suggested t♏o Dr. Anthony Fauci by two very prominent virologists in a January 2020 meeting he assembled at the beginning of the pandemic.
According to documents obtained by Bret Baier of Fox News, they told Fauci and Coll๊ins that the virus may have been m👍anipulated and origi🌳nated in the lab, but then suddenly changed their tune in public comments days after meeting with the NIH offici🧸als.
The virologists were later awarded nearly $9 million from Faucꩵi’s age✅ncy.
Misinformation #8: It was important to get the second vaccine dose three or four weeks after the first dose
Data were clear in the spring of 2021, just months after the vaccine rollout, that spacing the vaccine out by three months reduces complication rates and ꦗincreases imm🔥unity.
Spacing out vaccines would have also saved more lives when Americans were rationing a limited vaccine supply at the height of the epid🌳emic.
Misinformation #9: Data on the bivalent vaccine is ‘crystal clear’
Dr. Ashish ♏Jha famously said this, despite the bivalent vaccine being approved using data from eight mice.
To date, there ha𝕴s never🍒 been a randomized controlled trial of the bivalent vaccine.
In my opinion, the data are crystaꦇl clear that young people should not get the bivalent vaccine.
It would have also spared 📖many children myocarditis.
Misinformation #10: One in five people get long COVID
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claims that 20ꦫ% of COVID infections can result in long COVID.
But a UK study found that only 3% of COVID patients had residual symptoms lasting 12 weeks. What explains the disparity?
It’s often normal to experience mild fatigue or weakness for weeks after being sick and inactive and not eati🌳ng well.
Calling these cases long COVID is the medicalization of ordinary lif🎐e.
What’s most amazing about all the misinformation conveyed by CDC and public health officials is that there have been no apologies for holding on to their recommendations for so long after t𝐆he data became apparent that they were dead wrong.
Public health officials said “you must” when th𓄧e correct answer should have been “we’re not sure.”
Early on, in the absence of good data, public health offic🐟ials chos𒈔e a path of stern paternalism.
Today, theyܫ are🉐 in denial of a mountain of strong studies showing that they were wrong.
At minimum, the CDC should come clean and the FDA should add a warning label to COVID vaccines, clearly statꦑing what is now known.
A mea culpa by those who led us astray would𝄹 be a first step to♕ rebuilding trust.
Marty Makary MD, MPH is a professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and author of “The Price We Pay.”
