MLB

Five Mets who have the most to prove for rest of 2023 season

ST. LOUIS ā€” The Mets will have an established core returning in 2024 ā€” think Pete Alonso, Francisco Lindor and Brandon Nimmo, to name a few ā€” and none of them have much tšŸŒo prove over the final six weeks in a lost season.

And then thereā€™s the vast majority of the team.

šŸ·With 23 percent of the season still remaining, there is a decent enough sample size available to give team brass a better idea of who will fit where ā€” if anywhš“†ere ā€” for 2024.

Whā›„o has the most to pź¦rove between now and the spring training reporting date for pitchers and catchers in Port St. Lucie?

Start with these five players:

Starling Marte

The first step for šŸ™ˆthe veteran outfielder is returning to the lineup, but itā€™s still not cšŸ¦„lear when that might occur.

Starling Marte AP

Marte was eligible for removal from the injuršŸ”“ed ą± list Wednesday, but wasnā€™t deemed ready and didnā€™t travel with the team to St. Louis.

Itā€™s been a nightmare season for the 34-year-old Marte, who underwent surgery on bothš’†™ groins last November and then slumped through the first half.

In July he was sidelined on the Iā„±L by migraine headaches and, shortly after, was diagnosed with a right groin strain.

Marte isnā€™t even halfway through the four-year deal worth $78 million he received from the Mets, so team officials have to figure out ą·“how he fits into the equation.

Tylor Megill

The Mets see too much talent in the right-hander to just give up on him, so he will continue to ź§™receive opportunities to find his šŸøniche.

Tylor Megill AP

Megill has thrown harder since he returned from Triple-A Syracuse after the trade deadline, but location and high pitch countšŸ’§s have been his downfall.

In his three starts since rejoinź§‘ing the rotation, the 28-year-old hasź¦ pitched to a 7.20 ERA, but he perhaps took a baby step in his last start by limiting the Pirates to two runs over five innings.

If Megill doesnā€™t show anything šŸŒøas a starter over this final stretch, it could be time to revisit the idea of using him out of the bullpen.

Megill received a look as a reliever late šŸ’Žlast season and struggled, but giving him a fresh start in ā™ˆthe role with a spring-training buildup might work better.

Jeff McNeil

The 2022 National League battšŸ„€ing champion has showź¦”n improvement in August following a sluggish three-month stretch.

Though Jeff McNeil has started to hit better recently, he has disappointed offensively this season. Getty Images

McNeil had an underwhelming 2021 season and followed it with his surge last year. So which plšŸ§øayer is McNeil?

At this point, itā€™s more the 2021 McNeil, but a strong šŸ…finź¦°ish could at least sway the conversation into ā€œjust a first-half slumpā€ territory.

McNeil is probably still an everyday player given the dearth of other ą¼’options, but he ranks high on šŸ…˜the list of Mets disappointments this season.

David Peterson

Tāœ±he Mets will have three rotation vacancies this offseason following the trades that exported Justin VerlandšŸ€…er and Max Scherzer, and with Carlos Carrasco headed to free agency.

David Peterson Corey Sipkin for the NY Post

They almost certainly į©šį©šį©šį©šį©šį©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šš’€±į©šį©šį©šwill have to sign at least two starting pitchers to compete next season, but can we be certain that number will be three?

If fewer than three, team officials will haš“°ve to look from within at a group that includes Peterson, Megill, Joey Lucchesi and Mike Vasil.

The lefty Peterson has shown improvement following a first-halfšŸŒ  nosedive, but still isnā€™t working deep enough into starts.

He was effective as rotation depth last season, but took a šŸøstep backwaršŸ‘d this year.

There is still time for him ź§‹to change the narrative.

If Peterson došŸ­esnā€™t evolve as a starter, he has shown enough fš’ƒlashes as a reliever to warrant future consideration as a swingman.

Kodai Senga

Kodai Senga AP

ThšŸ¦©e best money spent by the Mets last winter might have been the five-year contract worth $75 million for Senga, who has been the teamā€™s top starting pitchš“†er this season.

But the question of whether Senga is ace material for next season and beyond still hasnā€™t been answered (although he was sharp in manhandling thešŸŒœ Cardinals on Saturday).

Maybe the Mets will acquire an ace in free agency over the winter, but it would be nice to know they have šŸ“–a fallback option if that doesnā€™tź¦— materialize.

Senga is getting thą± ere, but letā€™s see more of hišŸ’›s work.