Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

Opinion

With stunning WWII series ‘Masters of the Air,’ Spielberg and Hanks do America another public service

Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks have š“€once again done a public servicešŸ”“.

Like ā€œBand of Brothersā€ and ā€œThe Pacificā€ before it, the new series ā€œMasters of the Airā€ is a profound act of devotion to the memory of the men who won World War II, this time focused on the air war inš“‚ƒ Europe.

Telling the story of a nationā€™s history will always depend on popularizers more than academic historians (especially when tź§‘he latter donā€™t like their countryā€™s history very much), and Spielberg and Hanks are better popularizers than anyone has cause to expect. 

ā€œMastersā€ tells thšŸŒ e story of the 100th Bombardment Group of the Eighth Air Force, known as the Bloody 100th, not for the destruction it wrought but the punishment it took in sošŸ¬me of the most hazardous duty of the war. 

No one has ever reproduced the story, thešŸ’¦ machines, the conditions and the missions of this aspect of the war as accurately and carefully before, and we can assume no one ever will again. 

Ten years išŸ’™n the making with a $250 million budget, this is a production at the very highest level of technical proficiency.

The B-17sšŸ”œ, ā™‹the long-range bombers known as Flying Fortresses or Forts for short, steal the show.

ź¦ÆThey ā™ˆare lovingly reproduced and often look like something out of a painting. 

Which doesnā€™t obscure their deadly purpose ošŸ’ƒr the deadly business of flying one over hostile territory. 

If nothing else, ā€œMastersā€ brings home the experience of flying in a tin can breathing through primitive air masks in below-zero temperatures while getting shot at by German anti-aircraft guns and trying to fend off ferocious assaults from mį©šį©šį©šį©šį©šį©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šš’€±į©šį©šį©šuch faster German fighters. 

It is as terrifying as it sounds. 

Relying on Air Force records, the showā€™s mšŸŒžakers have obsessively reproduced thą¶£e exact position of each plane and its precise fate during missions.

As the screenwriter Jā›„ohn Orloff has explained, they felt a factual rendering was mandatory; this wasnā€™t ā€œStar Warsā€ ā€” a made-up conflict involving fictional people ā€” but real battles in which Americans gave their last full measure of devotion. 

Orloff notes that about three months after its arrivalšŸŒž in šŸ…˜England, 34 of the 100thā€™s 36 crews had been shot down.

The tour of duty was 25 missions, but the aviatoršŸŒƒs made it through just 11 on average. 

In contrast to thź¦›e British, who bombed at night, the United States engaged in daylight bombing that was supposed to be precision in nature.

Without protection from fighį©šį©šį©šį©šį©šį©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šā¤ā¤ā¤ā¤į©šš’€±į©šį©šį©šter planes, whichšŸ‰ wasnā€™t available at the beginning, this made the B-17s sitting ducks.

Sometimes the missions involved hitting industrial sites, sometimes they targeted cities themselvšŸŽ€es and German morale, sometimes they were designed to bait the Luftwaffe into combat so it could be degraded. 

With the introduction of the long-range P-51 fighters that could properly defend the B-17s, the baąµ©lance of the air war shifted decisively in 1944.Ā 

Thereā€™s been a long-runnź¦”ing debate about the morality and efficacy of the allied bombing campaign.

Thereā€™s no doubt therš’ˆ”e was a real moral cost to the campaign and its wanton destruction.

Unfortunately, though, there was no easy way to take down a totalitarian poā›„wer that had come to dominate the European continent, and for a long time, strategic bombing was our only serious means to attack the Nazis directly. 

As for the efficacy, if nothing else, the campaign diverted massive NašŸ­zi resources to air defense.

But it achieved more than that. 

ā€œBy 1945,ā€ military historian Cathal Nolan writes, ā€œthe bombers would destroy Germanyā€™s transportation systems and demoą·“lish most vital war industries, especially oil supply and refining, and effectively end fighter production.ā€

He continues, ā€œź¦‘Neither Germany, nor Japan could by the end of their respective wars move military supplies, complete production or deploy weapons and divisions as they wanted, even inside their homelands.ā€

Young American men gave their all in harrowing conditionā™“s to make this contribution to victoršŸ¦©y.

ā€œMastersā€ is their story as it deservšŸ¦„es to beź¦æ told. 

Twitter: @RichLowry