The COVID pandemic has ebbed, but one of its m💮ost damagi🌸ng long-term effects has not.
Chronic school absenteeism — collateral damage from students accustomed to staying homﷺe for alleged online learning — persists across the couꦡntry.
In New York City, a — some 353,000 — were chronically absent, ✤for the last💯 full school year (2021-22). The national figure is 22%.
It’s hardly a𒁏 way to combat ✃the learning loss of school lockdowns, which, per the , set back math and reading proficiency by two decades, especially for low-income students.
New York has tried a carrot approach to push parents to get their kids up and out in ꧑the mornings.
In 𝓰2022, Gov. Hochul authorized some $214 per child in back-to-school aid for ꩲfamilies on public assistance.
The city schools deploy a legion of “attendance tea🦄chers” to “
The problem has gotten worse but it’s not new. In 2013, Mayor Bloomberﷺg started a Truancy Reduction and Public Safety center — to 🃏little avail.
It’s time to remember that a child’s school attendance is first and foremost a parent’s responsibility — and a stick as well as a carrot can be deployed.
Under the🌳 state’s l🐻ast Republican Governor, George Pataki, this was understood.
For two short years, beginning in 1998, the state authorized “learnfare.”
Households receiving public assistance whose children were chronically absent could see their payments docked $60 a month ജ— in order
Households on public assis🌺tance account for some 148,000 city school kids, per the most data🧸 compiled by the
And sending one’s kids off to school is in keeping with the name of f📖ederal welfare law, the
What’s more, “learnfare” has been tried elsewhere — with positive effects. In Wisconsin, where “learnfare” originated, reductions in pu꧋blic assistance ranging from $60 to $190 a month “increased school enrollment by 3.7% and school attendance by 4.5%.
For students with the highes🍰t risk of dropping out, Learnfare increased school enrollment b⛎y 25%” per the .
Lear💜nfare is th🦹e law today in liberal Massachusetts, which shows that such an approach does not have to be draconian.
Chronic absence there leads to familie𒐪s being placed on “
ဣIf that’s followed by four or more unexcused absences in a month, only then is the childꦐ’s portion of public assistance cut off.
Three months of chronic absence le🍌ads to a referral to state social services.
Students with disabilities are exempt.
Incredibly, even schools in Mexico get the point. Its “Progresa” program — aimed at keeping kids in school and discouraging child labo🔯r — required school attendance as a condition of receiving an “education stipend” in some 500 poor rural areas.
An , found again that money talks: “childhood exposure to Mexico’s Progresa program raised꧅ average educational attainment by 1.4 years. Girls were 30% and boys 18% more likely to obtain some secondary education.”
Tough love perhaps —but🍌, as in Wisconsin, showing positiveꦯ results.
The school absenteeism problem🌠 is not limited to low-income households nor to those on public assistance.
Wealthy, se♚lf-indulgent families are taking their kids out of school for extended vacations.
Still, Nat Malkus of the Amerꦆican Enterprise Institute has found that chronic absence especially afflicts lowe🅘r-income homes.
Some 36% of ඣHis🔯panic students and 39% of Black students, he finds, are chronically absent.
“Chroni🌱c absenteeism increased for all district types, but rates were highest in districts with low achievement and higher poverty, affecting over one in three students.”
Sadly, New York City is such a school district.
Childhood poverty is an imposing ♕obstacle but need not be a lifetime barrier to success.
The so-called “success sequence” — finishing high school, getting a full-time job or post-secondary education, and postponing𒉰 child-bearing until after marriage — is a recipe for overcoming disadvantage.
But that sequence starts with fini🍌shing school — and not attending means not graduating.
Indeed, the very habit and discipline of class-time is the🌃 first step to success.
We all have a stake in an educated workforce. There’s no good reason our toolkit should not include bringing back “learnfare.”
Howard Husock is an American Enterprise Institute senior fellow and the author of “The Poor Side of Town — And Why We Need It.”
