Business

Kroger-Albertsons $25B merger hurts shoppers, FTC says as trial kicks off

The =Federal Trade Commission squared off in federal court on Monday with grocery chains Kroger and Alber🅺ts💝ons over whether a proposed merger would hurt or help shoppers, as a trial on the agency’s bid to block the deal began in Portland, Ore.

The FTC and several states sued to block the deal i🔯n February, saying the merger would mean𓆉 higher prices for consumers and less bargaining power for unionized grocery workers.

FTC Chief Trial Counsel Susan Musser urged US District Judge Adrienne Nelson on Monday to pause the deal, saying in opening statements that it would result in Kroger “swallowing” Albertsons.

The FTC and several states sued to block the deal in February, saying the merger would mean higher prices for consumers and less bargaining power for unionized grocery workers. Getty Images

“Stopping this multibillion-dollar deal will keep in place the vigorous competition that acts as a check on rising grocery prices and spurs improvements in quality and innovation,” she said.

Nelson is considering whether to pause the deal while an 🎉FTC in-house judge examines how it would impact competitio🌠n.

Such reviews can take years, and companies often abandon paused deals rather than com✤plete 𒉰the process.

Kroger attorney Matthew Wolf said in an opening statement that the merger would immedia🌠tely lower ꦐsome prices for shoppers at Albertsons, where prices are now 10-12% higher than at Kroger stores.

The FTC’s bid to bring down prices by blocking the deal shows “they neither understand the industry nor the parties within it,” Wolf said.

The merger is necessary, said Wolf, in order for the stores to compete with Walmart , the largest grocery retailer in the US, bulk shopping mainstay Costco and Amazon, which owns Whole Food🗹s.

Kim Cordova, president of a United ಌFood and Commercial Workers International Union local in Colorado an🧸d Wyoming, expressed skepticism about that argument at a press conference outside the courthouse.

“We don’t believe the company’s promise that they are doing this for competition,” she said.

“We don’t believe the company’s promise that they are doing this for competition,” said Kim Cordova, president of a United Food and Commercial Workers International Union local. AP

The case is a high-profile piece of the Biden administration’s push to lower prices for consumers, and comes as high grocery bills take prominence in the presidential race between Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate, and former President Donald Tru✃mp, her Republican opponent.

It is also a key test of FTC Chair Lina Khan’s initiative to use antitrust law to boost wages and mobility for workers.

Wolf said there is no difference between union wages at ;Kroger stores that are located n🧜ear Albertsons stores and those that are not.

Musser said unionized grocery workers secure better pay and benefits by striking at one store and sending customers to a rival. A merger between Kr🌺oger and Albertsons would lessen the severity of that threat, she said.

The trial is expected to last around three week♑s and feature evidence about how major grocery retailers and smaller rivals set prices and view competition in the industry.

Kroger and Albertsons are asking the judge to let the deal proceed, saying the tie-up is necessary to compete with multinational corporations like Walmart. AP

Kroger and Albertsons say the lawsuit’s focus on traditional supermarkets ignores that consumers typically shop for food at a variety of locations including big-box stores like Target and dollar stores such as Dollar Tree.

Kroger has said it will sell 579 of the approximately 5,000 stores it would own i𒀰f the deal is allowed to go through. Part of the trial will focus on whether buyer C&S Wholesale Grocers can successfully run them.

Kroger has also pledged to lower grocery prices by $1 billion after the merger.

Retailers use multipl🅺e levers to lower prices, including negotiating better deals with suppliers, investing in automation in the s𝓡upply chain or changing the way they label and package products.

Although Kroger said it could not provide more specifics on the details of the price investments, a source familiar with the matter indicated that the reductions wওill likely focus on essential and high-demand items first.

The trial is expected to last around three weeks and feature evidence about how major grocery retailers and smaller rivals set prices and view competition in the industry. AP

Musser said the investment represents only 0.5% of Kroger and Albertsons’ combined total revenue.

Arizona, California, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Wyoming and the District of Columbia are p💯ursuing the case alongside the FTC.

Washington and Colorado have filed their own lawsu🌠its to block the merger. The lawsuits are scheduled to go to trial after the Oregon case.