Opinion

Why won’t the White House just leave au-pairs alone — a program used by thousands of families

Working parents who depend on the nation’s au pair program to provide carಞe for their children can breathe a sigh of relief: After receiving over 10,000 public comments, 🐻the Biden-Harris administration announced that it’s its attempt to overhaul the program and make it unviable to the thousands of families who participate.

While a victory, families who host au pairs should pause any celebrations. Though the rule has been delayed, the S♚tate Department and publish new, revised regulations in January 2025.

Under a Harris-Walz administration, new reꦡgulations could look eerily similar to those proposed under the Biden-Harris administration𝐆.

A new law could shift how “au pairs” are paid, which would impact middle-class families hardest. whyframeshot – stock.adobe.com

Established in 1986, the au pair program is an educational and cultural ex🐟change program run through the State Department.

In exchange for providing flexible, in-home child care, au pairs get the opportunജity to visit America for up to two years, develop their English, and enroll in educational opportunities.

According to recent reports,

Despite acknowledging “,” last𒁃 fall the Biden-Hꦇarris administration proposed fundamental changes to the program that would make it unaffordable and unworkable for many host families.

Proposals to alter the “au-pair” law have been shelved until 2025 under the Biden administration, but a Harris-Walz win could see the onerous regulation made in into law, critics believe. Josh Morgan-USA TODAY
Like Harris, Donald Trump claims he cares about reducing family-care costs. AP

The Biden-Harris administration claimed these updates were necessary “to ensure au pairs have similar protections as those🔯 afforded to domestic workers.”

But as who’s parti𒀰cipated in the au pair program since 2017 put it, “It is disheartening to see these proposed rules that could turn this program into a privilege only for high-income Americans.”

In one of he♏r first rally speeches after replacing President Joe Biden at the top of the 2024 Democratic ticket, Vice President that “building up the middle class” and strengthening the “care economy” was one of her top priorities, which includes making child care more affordable.

Yet her administration’s proposal would’ve done the exact opposite for hard-working Americans, as : “I know many military families that take advantage of the prograꦆm because it provides t༒he flexibility and stability necessary in military life that traditional childcare options cannot provide.”

Minimum wage laws are meant﷽ to ensure that American workers have enౠough money to pay for their living expenses. But au pairs are not domestic workers with typical living expenses.

They are pa🅷rticipants in a voluntary exch𒉰ange where host families cover the au pair’s housing, utilities, meals, car insurance, cell phones, and other miscellaneous items.

Fꩲamilies also pay program fees costing around $10,000 each year, which cover the au pair’s airfare, health insurance, and more.

“I know many military families that take advantage of the program because it provides the flexibility and stability necessary in military life that traditional childcare options cannot provide,” one family explained. Monkey Business – stock.adobe.com

Au pairs then receive a weekly stipend, meant to be pocket money for discretionary expenses, not reflecting the true benefits af🦋forded to them. 

In its misguided attempt to “strengthen labor protections for au pairs,” the Biden-Harris administrat🐈ion proposed to reduce the allowable working hours and double or even triple their pay, costing families an additiona🐷l $10,000 to $20,000 each year.

For an administration with a track record of prioritizing the well-being of non-cit🧔izens over Americans, this proposal reflected more of🐎 that preference.

Form🍸er President Donald Trump would be wise to capitalize on this contradiction, calling out Harris for attempting to gut a beloved child-care program that families have depended on for decades.

Mo🌊reover, Trump could꧑ do more than just permanently protect the program’s viability; he could move to . 

An overwhelming majority of .

However, m꧃any senior citizens cannot live alone without support, such as help with light housework, meal preparation, and drivi🦋ng.

The au-pair system benefits both families and the au-pairs themselves, who receive food and housing in place of traditional nanny-styled salaries, according to reports.. Jamie Wilson – stock.adobe.com

Enabling elderly Americansꩲ to age in place by expanding the au pair program to include senior care could help thousands of elderly Americans age in place at zero cost to American taxpay🎃ers.

Life for working parents is already hard enough.

For those of us with young children and aging parents to worry about, t🍸he au pair program is a unique, affordable solution. 

I often refer to my current au pair from Brazi﷽l as my very own Marꦫy Poppins.

Instead of threatening to take away my child care, politicians should give more families th👍e opportunity to experience that magic. 

Kelsey Bolar is the director of storytelling at Independent Women’s Forum (iwf.org).