Opinion

Don’s health care transparency fix, Hochul punts on spending cuts and other commentary

Health desk: Don’s Health Care Transparency Fix

President Trump’s ā€œexecutive order requiring ā€˜radical’ healthcare priš’ce transparency,ā€ , ā€œwill revolutionize healthcare.ā€ It ā€œdoubles down on his first-term hospital and health insź§…urance price transparency rules requiring the publication of actual prices of care and coverage.ā€ And it’s needed: ā€œOnly 21.1% of hospitals nationwide are fully complying withā€ Trump’s first-term rules as the Biden team didn’t ā€œmeaningfully enforceā€ them. Health care ā€œis the only economic sector where consumers cannot see real prices before they buy,ā€ and thus ā€œprices for the same care can range by 10 times, even at the same hospital.ā€ ā€œTrump’s new order increases enforcement to boost complianceā€ and ā€œrequires actual prices — not estimates — so patients can shop with financial certainty.ā€ It ā€œwill finally make healthcare price transparency a reality.ā€

Eye on NY: Hochul Punts on Spending Cuts

New York’s ā€œā€˜all-funds’ budget, including federal aid, totals $254.4 billion, an increase of 4.5 percent or roughly double the inflation rate,ā€ . Medicaid ā€œaccounts for most of this year’s new spending,ā€ as the Legislature’s addition ā€œhikes the state share to almost $45 billion, an increase of 18.6 percent.ā€ Ignoring the risksšŸ„‚, ā€œlawmakers approved an unusually large increase in spending.ā€ Despite congressional plans to ā€œconstrain federal Medicaid funding,ā€ economic uncertainty and Trump actions that have cost the state an estimated $1.3 billion, the budget ā€œdoes not attempt to hedge against these threats.ā€ Instead, Hochul and the Legislature say they will ā€œcut spending later in the year as necessary.ā€

Foreign desk: Now’s the Time To Strike Iran

President Trump insists he’ll ā€œaccept nothing less than ā€˜total dismantlement’ of Iran’s nuclear program,ā€ . Yet ā€œthe mullahs in Tehran will never agree to that,ā€ and T♐rump may be tempted to accept ā€œsomething akin to the ā€˜worst deal in history,’ signed by President Obama in 2015.ā€ Yet Iran has ā€œnever been weaker,ā€ so ā€œnow is the time for a U.S.-Israeli strike to destroy Iran’s nuclear capability.ā€ Yes, that involves risks. But if Trump ā€œbelieves Iran can be trusted to execute a new pact, he hasn’t done his homework. If he settles for anything short of total dismantlement, it will be the moral equivalent of Joe Biden’s ignominious withdrawal from Afghanistan. Trust in his leadership will be gone.ā€

Libertarian: Souter’s Odd Claim to History

The ā€œunusual reasonā€ Justice David Souter, who died last week at 85, will be remembered, : ā€œthe severe and enduring backlash that he inspired.ā€ Named to the Supreme Court ā€œby Republican President George H.W. Bush, Souter quickly emerged as a consistent ā€˜liberal’ vote in high-profile cases about hot-button issues such as abortion and affirmative action.ā€ Hence ā€œthe battle cry of ā€˜No More Souters’ . . . whenever a Republican president had the chance to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. In practical terms, what that meant was ā€˜no more judicial nominees withā™’out verifiable conservative credentials.ā€™ā€ Don’t expect to soon see another justice who infuriates ā€œthe political party that first championed him while greatly benefiting the political party that first opposed him.ā€

From the right: The ā€˜Disparate Impact’ Obscenity

ā€œYou may not know the ins and outs of disparate impactā€ — the federal doctrine on racism Trump has moved to uproot via executive order, but Christopher Caldwell that ā€œyou’ve surely seen its effectsā€: the end of on-the-job meritocracy, as that ā€œproduces a lower-than-random number of protected minorities.ā€ Good for the prez on taking ā€œanother step toward uprooting the second constitution that has been in place since the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.ā€ The Civil Rights Act of 1991 ā€œintroduced disparate impact into black-letter U.S. law. It would have to be repealed to bring about the meritocracy Trump seeks.ā€ But perhaps congressional ā€œminds are changingā€ since both parties see ā€œwhat a devastating weapon civil-rights law can be — and, indeed, always has been.ā€

— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board